Donald freaks out, might change something

As always a few days before the Chief Executive’s annual policy address, the press is cluttered with irritating hints about what Donald Tsang will announce on Wednesday. Compliant and/or guileless newspapers report the leaked predictions largely without question or other comment, allowing the government’s amateurish spin-doctors to think they are expertly managing expectations.

The big prediction this time round is that the administration will tackle the problem of unaffordable housing by relaunching the subsidized Home Ownership Scheme. Specifically, the anonymous sources have been loudly insisting over the last week, it will start off with building 5,000 such apartments.

This could mean one of two things. Either Sir Bow-Tie is going to announce the construction of 5,000 HOS units. Or he will announce a larger number, say 8,000, which will shock, amaze and delight the population into ignoring the fact that either way such a measure is just a lottery to benefit a lucky few, leaving hundreds of thousands of people still unable to afford a halfway decent home.

However, something else seems to be afoot. The CE is now saying that he will break with tradition and introduce unconventional policies to tackle the problem. He is more or less admitting that the government made a mistake in its perverted determination to force property prices up over much of the last decade (why not force up the cost of other essential commodities like food, clothing or medicine while you’re at it?) Perhaps, also, Donald would like the history books to have something positive to say about him after his rags-to-glory career ends next year – though in all fairness, he did scrap half-day working on Saturdays.

Skeptics can be forgiven for having doubts: all feasible solutions to Hong Kong’s overinflated property prices ultimately require the government to accept less revenue from land sales and/or the developers to suffer lower profit margins. But it is hard to see why Donald would raise, rather than depress, hopes just before delivering his address.

Other critics might suggest that with a new administration taking over in mid-2012, he cannot do much even if he wants to – he can’t commit his successors to new long-term policies at this stage. But this misunderstands the way Hong Kong is run. The transition next year, insofar as there is one, will be seamless; it has already started with the elevation of Stephen Lam from Constitutional Affairs to the Chief Secretary’s office vacated by Henry Tang ahead of the Chief Executive quasi-election campaign. The same people will be running the city behind the scenes: senior civil servants, desperate to balance the interests of ‘various sectors’ (half for the tycoons, half for everyone else) and avoid criticism from Beijing.

That doesn’t mean Donald is about to unveil anything large-scale. But it does look like he’s going to set a new precedent and break with some aspect of the old way of doing things; it could be the land-revenue link, planning rules, or whatever. Ideally, he would find a way of reserving more space for people who want homes to live in rather than for those who crave concrete boxes as an investment. It might be something mainly symbolic or completely stupid – it doesn’t matter. The point is that it would take the wind out of CE-aspirant CY Leung, who has radical ideas about this very subject. Henry could endorse the wonderful new approach and promise to continue with it as CE. The rest of us would dance in the streets with joy. Then, just as the new policy kicks in, Europe finally goes bankrupt and the market crashes anyway.

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Donald freaks out, might change something

  1. Box Cutter says:

    Maybe he’ll introduce a law requiring, as a condition of sale of a residential property, an independent certification of net square footage performed by a licensed third party paid for by the seller, with massive penalties and possible jail time for fraud.

    That would at least give the ICAC something better to do than prosecuting 80-year-old men for selling their signatures on a Jockey Club membership application.

  2. Big Al says:

    Back to the Stud Muffin for a moment, I note that he has not declared his extramarital affair to have been with a woman. Just look at the facts: His affair was said to have been with an Assistant AO – there are both male and female AOs; whatshername at HKGCC vehemently denied it was her – a little too vehemently, if you ask me, as if she knew Stud’s personal preferences; and his “wife” looks like CY Leung, as has already pointed out. Taken together … well, I think the public should be told!

  3. Vile says:

    One should point out that Donald only scrapped Saturday working for government. For everyone else it’s officially still a working day (though I cannot fathom how those companies that insist on making their staff come in for a bi-weekly Saturday morning gossip and internet browse still manage to recruit). This is why we lose an unseemly portion of our public holidays every year.

  4. Tiu Fu Fong says:

    We have an unseemly number of public holidays, so losing an unseemly portion of them has never struck me as a fundamental injustice.

  5. Holidaymaker says:

    Vile hits the nail on the head. Higher salaries and lesser working hours for civil servants, clearly a glorious day for the good governance of Hong Kong.

    As for choosing between employers, I recommend going for one that has a five day working week and converts Saturday public holidays into extra annual leave. Such companies do exist and it is a happy thing.

  6. maugrim says:

    Big Al, the word is married Western women with families, possibly hence the reticence for details.

    Vile, they can recruit because a crappy job paying $14,000 a month for 60 hours work is better than a crappy job paying $6,000 for 60 hours work.

  7. Real Tax Payer says:

    I wonder if CY will indeed make a big speech tomorrow on the eve of Donald’s last duck out address….?

    Seems that the reality of what Don has failed to do in his second term is finally catching up with him

    Pity that Sunday’s anti-Lam march coincided with NZ vs Argentina, otherwise I might have joined in ( If the march had been on Saturday and I had known England was going to lose so miserably to France I would definitely have joined the march . Not sure which is the lesser of two evils : the Weasel as CS or losing to France )

  8. PropertyDeveloper says:

    Maugrim, the word a couple of days ago was a foreign-born woman of Chinese descent.

    I doubt Sir Bow-Tie will make any radical changes to housing “policy”: it’s not in his character, the timing would be off and, as H says, events elsewhere may swamp any effects.

  9. Stephen says:


    You seem to have some idea on this ? come on flesh out the details …

  10. Big Al says:

    RTP: Losing to France, definitely!

Comments are closed.