Tiny number of people affected by NatSec Law grows again

The authorities are preventing Hongkongers moving to the UK from cashing in their retirement savings early – a longstanding right for people leaving town permanently. The reasoning (that the Hong Kong government doesn’t recognize BNO passports, so therefore the departees can’t claim overseas residency) is obviously absurd. Is there some way (UK government action?) to pressure HSBC and other MPF providers with UK operations to release emigres’ savings now and reclaim the money when those clients turn 65?

There’s an interesting debate about whether the CCP wants malcontents to leave Hong Kong or (perhaps for reasons of face) would prefer them to stay. Beijing’s post-1997 immigration policies make clear that dilution or displacement of the local population is an underlying strategy, and the recent NatSec regime couldn’t be better designed to drive people out. But the UK’s granting of residency to BNO holders obviously touches a raw nerve: Chinese people are the emperor’s property. 

Facebook, Twitter and Google could quit Hong Kong if the NatSec regime makes their employees liable under revised privacy laws aimed at curbing ‘doxxing’ of police and other officials (link to original WSJ scoop here).

Internet companies generally comply with such rules in other jurisdictions – but the laws are proportionate, and these are typically countries with rule of law and accountable governments. Police states, on the other hand, don’t allow Western social media sites in the first place. Which is Hong Kong?

And Hong Kong officials claimed a few months back that real-name registration of SIM cards was now suddenly necessary to fight ordinary commercial crime. But Beijing’s guy doesn’t bother with the lame fibs. It’s a NatSec regime thing. But you knew that.

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Tiny number of people affected by NatSec Law grows again

  1. Tom Cruisinforabruisinbythepopo says:

    We can all curl up for an evening watching “Minority Report” and imagine it all to be in HK.

  2. Goatboy says:

    On the other hand, record numbers of primary school kids are getting their first choice of secondary schools due to emigration so – you know – every cloud…

  3. Chris Maden says:

    7 million out of 1.4 billion is 0.5%. A tiny number and a small price to pay…

  4. Hugh Janus says:

    To all your readers and yourself.

    Oh! we don’t want to lose you but we think you ought to go
    For your King and your Country both need you so;
    We shall want you and miss you but with all our might and main
    We shall cheer you, thank you, kiss you When you come back again.

  5. Pope Innocent says:

    Whether, deep down, China cares about Hong Kongers leaving may be debatable. What it most certainly does care is capital leaving.

  6. Chinese Netizen says:

    The “Great July Hong Kong Bomb Plot” is gaining traction in overseas media. Whether it’s true or not, I’m skeptical now knowing the HK government for what it is. Overseas readers, however, may not be so “in the loop” and are thinking what an amazing job the popo are doing in HK busting SO MANY plot rings and POTENTIAL terrorist acts. Makes you wonder about what clairvoyants they’re employing on the government payroll?

Comments are closed.