Although the chances of it happening are about 4 trillion to 1, it would be rather fun if the pair of us got picked to sit on her jury. Also, it would save the hassle of each day having to queue for a seat in the public gallery.

Hope to see you soon, J.

You will be sorely disappointed on all counts.

Ms Milkshake is not a murderer – otherwise why would she be getting a retrial?

Actually my fascination with the young lady stems from the fact that when she’s scrubbed up (or not in the scrubs), I think she looks pretty hot. Sorry, but I can’t help it.

J.

Post can’t even be arsed subbing out the foreign point of view ‘the former British colony’. Tony Chan’s case also contained a ‘heady mix’ last week, though, so they might have put that in.

Pardon me for butting in. Why the curiosity?

As someone who saw most of the trial, the Appeal and the CFA proceedings and got to know the father of the deceased, I can tell you that Ms Kissel is a boring and banal individual.

The secret of most murderers is that they are very ordinary people who, for once in their lives, did something extraordinary. That doesn’t make them into subjects worthy of much attention, in my view.

Their victims and the lives they harm around them – in her case, her children’s above all – are much more worthy of empathy and interest.

Let her rot in the temple of banality – prison.

If people are daft enough to fall for this nonsense, then so be it.

Actually, Hemmers, I was hoping for 2-3 paras on Milkshake Nancy. To this end, pehaps you could knock something out for us this afty.

Ta, J.